For Now Only Brad Cooper Knows He Killed His Wife

Crooked in Canada

the ghost of Archie Bunker is Canadian and in your face

For Now Only Brad Cooper Knows He Killed His Wife

October 18th, 20083 Comments

When Nancy Cooper arrived home late on Friday, July 11 she was looking forward to going to bed after a late night of partying with her girlfriends, but her husband Brad likely had other ideas and now the woman is dead. Of course a jealous and angry Brad had other plans for her when she arrived home, and I have no doubt in my mind that he waited for her to arrive home on that Friday night so that he could tear a strip out of her, give her a piece of his mind.

I’m assuming that that was the case in the Cooper’s North Carolina home on that night, and I am also going to assume that in the heat of that argument he picked with his soon-to-be ex-wife, or perhaps in the aftermath of that argument the next morning while she was getting dressed to go for a jog, he strangled her, making sure the couple’s children were no where in sight at the time of his dastardly deed. The last thing he needed if he was going to get away with murder was for his children to see him strangling his mother. Maybe he planned her death, or perhaps he unintentionally killed Nancy while trying to make his point, but nevertheless Crooked in Canada firmly believes until evidence suggest otherwise, Brad Cooper, a man who has been described as cruel and emotionally detached by his ex-fiancée, is the reason Nancy’s half-clothed body was found faced down in a puddle of water a few  days after she was reported missing by a friend she was supposed to meet up with on July 12.

Interesting that the man I consider to be the prime suspect in his wife’s death didn’t feel the need to contact police about his missing wife and a devoted mother that it took a friend of his wife’s to realize that something wasn’t right when Nancy failed to call her.

An innocent man, especially one headed for a divorce and child-custody dispute would have contacted somebody if his wife failed to return to from a morning jog after being gone for several hours, if only to have the opportunity to paint his wife in a bad light, and to add weight to his argument that he would make the better parent to have sole-custody of the children. He didn’t though, and for a guy who did some research on fathers during custody battles, surely he would have learned that a mother abandoning her children is a card he could have played in divorce court, whether she was found dead or alive, after all according to him she was just going for a morning jog and she left the kids with for a long time before the police contacted him about his missing wife. It doesn’t make sense. Maybe I’m not making sense, which in Crooked in Canada happens to me sometimes. I’m as confused as this case is and Brad Cooper’s actions or lack thereof are.

The woman even called Brad to encourage him to call police. He didn’t of course, and that in itself indicates to me that he might have known that his wife wasn’t coming home, and the last thing he wanted to do was have the police on his doorstep asking him questions before he come up with a story to tell the police about his wife’s disappearance. He would have needed more than a few hours to compose himself for the onslaught of police interrogation he would face once the cops were on the case of the disappearing wife.

Whether I make any sense or not I still believe that Brad Cooper is responsible for the death of his wife, that he strangled her while she was getting dressed to go for her morning jog, and somehow managed to dispose of his wife’s body with the couple’s children totally oblivious to what was going on around them, if in fact they were even present, which I am assuming they were given that I haven’t read anywhere else that the kids were not at home while their mother was out for her morning jog.

Then again maybe Brad killed his children while they lie sleeping in their beds, and that he was able to sneak out of the house unbeknownst to his children for a few minutes after he killed his wife to dispose of her body. Nancy’s body wasn’t found all that far from the couple’s home was she, at the most what, a five, maybe 10 minute drive round-trip? I don’t know, but…

To add credibility to his claim that he had nothing to do with his wife’s murder Brad has gone out of his way to mention that despite having a $75 thousand life insurance policy on his wife at the time of her untimely death, he has yet to collect that money let alone even apply for it. He made that claim in a videotaped court deposition earlier this month, and I’ll assume that it had something to do with the child-custody dispute he is having with his in-laws who currently have custody of the couple’s two children.

Obviously he was trying to score brownie points when he made that claim, but I fail to see how making such a claim would help him in his child-custody dispute with his dead wife’s parents. It has nothing to do with whether or not is children would be safe with him or well looked after. His mental health; whether he suffered from depression or had thoughts of suicide, things that also came out during that same deposition would of course be relevant in a child-custody dispute.

Finally, I don’t think Nancy Cooper’s murder is getting the headlines it deserves, and that as long as the press is reluctant for whatever reason to give more coverage to this story, the amount of pressure North Carolina police are putting on her so-called grieving husband, the same man who many have described as being emotionally detached, isn’t enough to force Brad’s conscience to get the better of him and cop to his wife murder.

He knows he killed his wife, and he is smart enough to know that as long as there are no witnesses (which there are not-not even one who saw the woman on her morning jog) and as long as he sticks to his story, nobody will be able to pin the murder on him. He may have very well committed the perfect murder, and unless more pressure is put on him, he will never break.

Brad Cooper, the last person to see his wife alive, is being treated with kid gloves by both the North Carolina police and the press, and for somebody who should be the prime suspect in his wife’s death, he is getting off way to easy as far as his treatment by the police and press goes. There is something wrong with that picture when suspects in far less heinous crimes are put under the 10 times the amount pressure Brad has been put under.

Nancy Cooper Murder: Her Husband Did It, No Doubt In My Mind About It

Could a Death Sentence Be in Brad Cooper’s Future?





Tags: Crooked in Canada

3 responses so far ↓

  • 1 A more impartial observer // Oct 18, 2008 at 2:55 PM

    Convenient how you neglect to mention the eye witness who happened to see Nancy alive and jogging at 7h10 on the morning of her disappearance. If you are following the case closely enough to know of the life insurance policy then you would also surely have read about the eyewitness.

    CG responds:

    Last I heard the eyewitness wasn’t able to confirm the identity of the jogger as being Nancy, that the only confirmation given was that it was a woman. I guess you haven’t been following the case as closely as you imply I should be following the case.

    Nevertheless whether she died at home or while jogging I have no doubt in my mind the husband had something to do with it.

    I suppose you are giving the benefit of the doubt to the emotionall detached and cruel husband. That’s cool.

    Regards

  • 2 observer // Oct 19, 2008 at 12:15 AM

    I believe you have pinned the tail on the donkey. I also believe the police need to make sure they have enough evidence to convince a jury. I wonder if some more lab results will be forthcoming to pinpoint a more definite timeframe which would have prevented the woman from seeing Nancy on her jog.

    CG responds:

    I was unaware that that eyewitness was able to positively identify Nancy as the jogger she had seen at 7.10am on that Saturday morning. How credible is the eyewitness, and furthermore how credible do the police think the eyewitness is? I have a tough time believing that the eyewitness’s information is credible, not to mention that she is the sole eyewitness. I think the eyewitness is mistaken, and that if she saw somebody jogging, it was somebody else she saw.

    As for Brad, he won’t be able to keep this charade up forever, and sooner or later his “mental state” will get the better of him, and the truth of what happened shall spew.

    One other thing that has crossed my mind; did he not take a polygraph? I thought he did, but then again I’m thinking he refused to submit to one, and then agreed to take one. I don’t know, the story hasn’t been getting as much coverage as it should be getting in Canada, and it has been several months since Nancy was strangled. My memory is vague about the case now, and I don’t remember if a polygraph was given or not.

    Nevertheless I still think Brad murdered his wife. It may not have been pre-meditated, but I think he had an argument with his wife over the fact that she was out late with friends on the eve of her death, and that her husband knowing that his wife was very capable of sleeping with other men, as he with other women, flew into a jealous rage after what may have been provocation by his wife.

    Regards

    Regards

  • 3 Brad Cooper Charged With First-Degree Murder // Oct 28, 2008 at 5:09 PM

    [...] I was about this case, I won’t. But to “A more partial observer” who commented on the last article I published about this case in Crooked in Canada I only have to this to say to you, “You were saying [...]

comments








Crooked in Canada use third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit this website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you.




Disclaimer:Opinions, views and theories published in Crooked in Canada are just that, views, opinions and theories.VIEWS, OPINIONS AND THEORIES ARE THAT OF CROOKED AND CANADA AND NOT OF CANADIAN WEBHOSTING, EVER.


All views, opinions and theories are formed after gleaning information from news stories that appear on the worldwide web, which as we all are not always factual either.


All opinions, views, and theories are qualified with the following or like statements: "I could be wrong", "It isn't a stretch to think that...", "I think", "I believe" or "it is my opinion". Although the aforementioned statements are not always included in the blog post; it is certainly implied in each and every post published in Crooked in Canada.If you take this blog too seriously, YOU NEED HELP!

Contact: editor@crookedincanada.com