Crooked in Canada

Tara MacDonald. Killer mom? Complicit in month old disappearance of daughter Victoria aka Tori? She knows what happened but isn’t telling?

There are a lot of questions marks following Tara MacDonald around when it comes to the disappearance of her daughter, especially when it comes to chatter in news forums and blogs on the Internet, and rightfully so.

Let’s face it, Ms MacDonald isn’t exactly coming across as a believable suspect in her 8-year-old daughter’s disappearance, and some of the story she is telling…Well, it seems a little far fetched. Publicly though, I have to admit, she is putting on quite a show.

So anyway, have you heard the story about how Ms MacDonald plans to cash in some more on her daughter’s disappearance?  Yeah, that’s right…Now that the bike rally has been completed (don’t know how much money that raised for her), Ms MacDonald has found herself another money making opportunity to help her out with the bills around the house during the rough patch her, her boyfriend (common-law husband?), and children have hit.

She wants to sue those of us on the Internet who are a little bit suspicious when it comes to the story she is telling. There has been quite a few if us making opinions, and putting their own ‘spin’ on her story.  I just happen to be one of those people, and I admit, I could be wrong about Ms MacDonald.

Only Tori knows what happened, and unfortunately, she is nowhere to be found at the moment.

According to Ms MacDonald, sometime this week her lawyer is going to look into pursuing some sort of legal avenues against bloggers and commentators who are guilty of accusing, suggesting, or hinting at the idea that Ms MacDonald may have had something to do with the disappearance of her daughter, a disappearance that I BELIEVE Ms MacDonald is treating like a meal-ticket, you know for that fame and fortune thing.

I tell ya what, if Ms MacDonald wants to sue me for what I have opined about her in Crooked in Canada, bring it on baby.  I would welcome any opportunity to question her about my opinions and suspicions about her involvement in the disappearance of Tori, and her suing me would give me an opportunity to test some of my theories on her while she was under oath.

I would welcome any legal action Ms MacDonald would want to bring against me, but that actually happening is wishful thinking on my part.

I wonder if Ms MacDonald’s lawyer has advised her of the risks of suing those of us who are having a tough time believing her story.

Please Ms MacDonald, sue me.

Any impending lawsuits aside, Ms MacDonald has stepped up her campaign of denial in having anything to do with, or knowing anything about her daughter’s mysterious disappearance. Take this past Friday for example.

On that day (May 8th) she lashed out us ‘ignorant’ people for speculating that she may have had something to do with her daughter’s appearance, or that she might know a little bit more about her daughter’s disappearance than she is telling.  She wanted the world to know that she was saddened and frustrated by people like me, and that she was tired of the gossip and the rumours.

All I have to say to that is, “Booeffinhoo. She has nobody to blame but herself when it comes to what I, or anybody else is thinking when it comes to the story she is telling.”

I don’t think anybody can deny that Ms MacDonald’s tale, especially the one about her being secretly hustled off in a limousine, is doing her any favours in the ‘credibility‘ department.

Now if ever there was a time for the police and the public to doubt what is coming out of her mouth, that would have been the time to do so.

She wasn’t very convincing, at least not to me she wasn’t, and I’m still laughing that one off.

Oh, say by the way, has anybody besides Ms MacDonald and her immediate family actually been able to corroborate that ridiculous story, or has the mystery person in the limousine story come forward to back Ms MacDonald’s claim.  Just curious about that since there doesn’t seem to be any mention on the Internet about that person coming forward, unless I missed it. I’m not very good a googling sometimes.

To the best of my recollection there has only been one eyewitness account since the day Tori disappeared, and that account comes in the form of CCTV footage that the police used to make a sketch of who they think may have been the last person to see Tori alive. I don’t know, but I’m really thinking that the last person to see Tori alive was her mother, and the composite sketch released by police kind of, sort of looks like ‘mommy’.

Of course, Ms MacDonald has denied there is any likeness between her and the person in that sketch, but I guess it depends on who is doing the comparing. I couldn’t tell one way or the other, though when it came to the eyes, I kind of thought there might be a similarity between Ms MacDonald, and the suspect in the sketch. Not much of a similarity, but they eyes and brow, kind of caught my attention.

Yeah, so anyway Ms MacDonald is looking to cash in some more, only this time she intends to sue those of us who aren’t buying into the story she is telling. I wish her luck with that, but at the end of the day, if that is what she wants to do and her lawyer backs her up, then all the money making power to her. I hope she sends a little bit of that lawsuit my way. I could definitely use the publicity for my blog.

Come on Ms MacDonald, spread a little bit of that lawsuit threat my way, and let’s see what happens. Let’s see who is going to cash in more on your daughter’s disappearance, you, or me.

Her denial and threat can be read @ http://www.canada.com/Missing+child+mother+insists+behind+abduction/1580667/story.html