<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friday the 13th Could Be the Beginning of the End for Omar Khadr</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crookedincanada.com/2009/11/friday-the-13th-could-be-the-beginning-of-the-end-for-omar-khadr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crookedincanada.com/2009/11/friday-the-13th-could-be-the-beginning-of-the-end-for-omar-khadr/</link>
	<description>the ghost of Archie Bunker is Canadian and in your face</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 05:20:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CG</title>
		<link>http://www.crookedincanada.com/2009/11/friday-the-13th-could-be-the-beginning-of-the-end-for-omar-khadr/comment-page-1/#comment-2046</link>
		<dc:creator>CG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 20:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crookedincanada.com/?p=3480#comment-2046</guid>
		<description>G&#039;Day flipper,

As far as Michelle Shephard goes; given that she has written a book about the case, I am going to assume that she has good, unfettered access to the Khadr family in Ontario, and that when it suits his lawyers, she has access to them too, probably more than any other journalist. Having said that, I think it is pretty safe to assume that there were pre-conditions to her getting that kind of access, one of which would have been to tell the story she is telling now, and in her book so that it shows that Khadr is being railroaded, and to you know, paint him in a light that draws sympathy.  That&#039;s why she is so biased I think.

As for how anybody could misconstrue what Eric Holder said is totally beyond me. Even if you read between the lines, there is no way you could misinterpret what Holder was saying, that Omar was going to face justice, and if after facing justice he can be repatriated, the Americans will look at that. I don&#039;t know, maybe the Americans are open to letting Omar serve out any prison time he is given if he is found guilty, in Canada.

Now about those charges. There is little doubt in my mind that he is going to be found guilty of the terrorism charges he faces, that video of him smiling away while making bombs the most damning piece of evidence against, but I don&#039;t think he is going to do anymore time than he will have done by the time he is found guilty of that charge.  As for the first-degree murder charge, that&#039;s a tough one, but I think there might be enough evidence against him to convict him on that too if my gut is right about there being &quot;other witnesses&quot; and heavier evidence against him, the kind of evidence that military prosecutors are keeping close to their vest. 

Omar&#039;s supporters are in for a very rude awakening I think when this trial actually starts to move forward, and at the end of the day there is little doubt in my mind that justice will be served. There is nothing his supporters, not even journalists, can do to change what the U.S. has in store for Omar, and there is no way the he is just going to walk out of Guantanamo and into Canada. 

What people aren&#039;t understanding (in my opinion anyway) is that whatever the Supreme Court of Canada rules, the federal government, at least until the Liberals get back into office (lol, I crack myself up sometimes), aren&#039;t going to, and don&#039;t have to, do shit for Omar. They can heed the court&#039;s ruling, but at the end of the day they don&#039;t have to do anything more than try to repatriate him, and they don&#039;t have to try hard at it as long as they look like they are trying. Furthermore, its not like the feds can force the U.S. into repatriating Omar if the Supreme Court orders it to do so anyway. 

The Supreme Court action, to me anyway, is nothing more than a token gesture, lip service to shut people up about it. Does that make sense?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G&#8217;Day flipper,</p>
<p>As far as Michelle Shephard goes; given that she has written a book about the case, I am going to assume that she has good, unfettered access to the Khadr family in Ontario, and that when it suits his lawyers, she has access to them too, probably more than any other journalist. Having said that, I think it is pretty safe to assume that there were pre-conditions to her getting that kind of access, one of which would have been to tell the story she is telling now, and in her book so that it shows that Khadr is being railroaded, and to you know, paint him in a light that draws sympathy.  That&#8217;s why she is so biased I think.</p>
<p>As for how anybody could misconstrue what Eric Holder said is totally beyond me. Even if you read between the lines, there is no way you could misinterpret what Holder was saying, that Omar was going to face justice, and if after facing justice he can be repatriated, the Americans will look at that. I don&#8217;t know, maybe the Americans are open to letting Omar serve out any prison time he is given if he is found guilty, in Canada.</p>
<p>Now about those charges. There is little doubt in my mind that he is going to be found guilty of the terrorism charges he faces, that video of him smiling away while making bombs the most damning piece of evidence against, but I don&#8217;t think he is going to do anymore time than he will have done by the time he is found guilty of that charge.  As for the first-degree murder charge, that&#8217;s a tough one, but I think there might be enough evidence against him to convict him on that too if my gut is right about there being &#8220;other witnesses&#8221; and heavier evidence against him, the kind of evidence that military prosecutors are keeping close to their vest. </p>
<p>Omar&#8217;s supporters are in for a very rude awakening I think when this trial actually starts to move forward, and at the end of the day there is little doubt in my mind that justice will be served. There is nothing his supporters, not even journalists, can do to change what the U.S. has in store for Omar, and there is no way the he is just going to walk out of Guantanamo and into Canada. </p>
<p>What people aren&#8217;t understanding (in my opinion anyway) is that whatever the Supreme Court of Canada rules, the federal government, at least until the Liberals get back into office (lol, I crack myself up sometimes), aren&#8217;t going to, and don&#8217;t have to, do shit for Omar. They can heed the court&#8217;s ruling, but at the end of the day they don&#8217;t have to do anything more than try to repatriate him, and they don&#8217;t have to try hard at it as long as they look like they are trying. Furthermore, its not like the feds can force the U.S. into repatriating Omar if the Supreme Court orders it to do so anyway. </p>
<p>The Supreme Court action, to me anyway, is nothing more than a token gesture, lip service to shut people up about it. Does that make sense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flipper</title>
		<link>http://www.crookedincanada.com/2009/11/friday-the-13th-could-be-the-beginning-of-the-end-for-omar-khadr/comment-page-1/#comment-2045</link>
		<dc:creator>flipper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crookedincanada.com/?p=3480#comment-2045</guid>
		<description>Funny ,the TORONTO STAR has a whole different slant on the American proceedings.One of their articles (in a special section) is titled &quot;U.S opens door for Omar Khadr&#039;s  return to Canada!&quot;.The article focuses on the fact that the Supreme Court of Canada has yet to rule on wether or not the Judiciary has the right to interfere in the workings of the State dep&#039;t. The Torstar has taken this little quote by Eric  Holder to mean that Khadr  WILL BE FREED!!!!!
These so-called journalists have ,once again ,skewed the main story to  conform to their beliefs that KHADR is an innocent child soldier captured ,shot and tortured by the Evil Americans (our allies)...The main point of Holder&#039;s  press conference was to announce that 5 Guantanamo Jihadists would face criminal trials in New York city (just a few blocks from the Twin towers site-how  poetic) and that Khadr ,along with 4 others will face a Military Commission.This of course ,infuriated his newly appointed defense lawyer ,who thought that Omar would face justice in a civilian court where the rules are a lot more lax.
How the Tronto Star manages to twist these facts is a testament to their reporting staff especially Michelle Sheperd- she has even written a book on OMAR &quot;Guantanamo&#039;s Child &quot; which makes her a little biased on the subject .I cannot believe the lack of journalistic integrity shown by such a major newspaper!
 As stated in your blog, Omar is finally going to get his day in court,much to the dismay of his supporters,his terrorist family,his latest legal counsel and any other bleeding heart that supports this terrorist puke!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny ,the TORONTO STAR has a whole different slant on the American proceedings.One of their articles (in a special section) is titled &#8220;U.S opens door for Omar Khadr&#8217;s  return to Canada!&#8221;.The article focuses on the fact that the Supreme Court of Canada has yet to rule on wether or not the Judiciary has the right to interfere in the workings of the State dep&#8217;t. The Torstar has taken this little quote by Eric  Holder to mean that Khadr  WILL BE FREED!!!!!<br />
These so-called journalists have ,once again ,skewed the main story to  conform to their beliefs that KHADR is an innocent child soldier captured ,shot and tortured by the Evil Americans (our allies)&#8230;The main point of Holder&#8217;s  press conference was to announce that 5 Guantanamo Jihadists would face criminal trials in New York city (just a few blocks from the Twin towers site-how  poetic) and that Khadr ,along with 4 others will face a Military Commission.This of course ,infuriated his newly appointed defense lawyer ,who thought that Omar would face justice in a civilian court where the rules are a lot more lax.<br />
How the Tronto Star manages to twist these facts is a testament to their reporting staff especially Michelle Sheperd- she has even written a book on OMAR &#8220;Guantanamo&#8217;s Child &#8221; which makes her a little biased on the subject .I cannot believe the lack of journalistic integrity shown by such a major newspaper!<br />
 As stated in your blog, Omar is finally going to get his day in court,much to the dismay of his supporters,his terrorist family,his latest legal counsel and any other bleeding heart that supports this terrorist puke!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
