Fort Hood Shooter Was Raging Muslim

Crooked in Canada

the ghost of Archie Bunker is Canadian and in your face

Well Daah, Of Course Nadil Malik Hasan Was Raging Muslim

November 8th, 20097 Comments

Huh, lots being said on the worldwide web about that Muslim terrorist (that’s exactly what he was) who went on that shooting rampage at Fort Hood, including this, “Massacre suspect simmered with rage“.

Gee, ya think, and how many Muslims might there be in the Canadian military simmering with rage, never mind the U.S. Army?  I bet as I am sitting here tapping this blog article out, there’s a Muslim soldier in the Canadian army secretly honoring, maybe even celebrating what Major Nadil Malik Hasan pulled off in Killeen, Texas the day before yesterday. I wouldn’t bet the farm on it, if I owned one, but I would be willing to part with a few dollars if somebody can convince I’m wrong.

Muslims, Canadian army, the war in Afghanistan, and a Muslim wanted to come across as doing right by Canada while doing right by Allah, and well…That pretty much says it all, right.

Nope, no Muslims in the Canadian army, that’s what I say, at least not while there are Canadian troops in Afghanistan anyway. Better to err on the side of caution when it comes to religion freedom in the Canadian military, don’t you think?

Yeah so anyway, this Hasan nut job, apparently he was simmering with rage against the U.S. government, and decided to take that rage out on his fellow soldiers, the ones he would have stood side by side with in Iraq in the upcoming weeks.

He didn’t feel the U.S. should be in Iran or Afghanistan cleaning those shit holes out, and he certainly wasn’t into being deployed in either country where he would have been expected to aim and shoot some of his fellow Muslims from time-to-time, depending of course on the circumstances he would have been in while standing alongside his American comrades (the infidels in his mind) in arms.

Major Hasan, who his cousin said on Fox was a good American, was all terrorist, a homegrown one at that.

As far as I’m concerned, it’s an Allah-damned shame that the woman that took him down, police Sgt. Kimberly Denise Munley didn’t kill him in the gunfight she got into with him. That doesn’t make her any less a hero though, and the injured Munley should be treated as such for the rest of her life as far as CG is concerned.

She’s a pistol-packing babe I wouldn’t mind hanging out with.

As for Hasan, they execute killers in Texas, and when the last chapter in this story is finally written (it is going to take years for that to happen by the way), a Muslim will have been executed in the U.S. That’s going to make for huge headlines too, and boy won’t that piss off the Muslims living in the U.S. who think they shouldn’t have to abide by anybody’s laws but their own.

If they sold tickets to Hasan’s execution (and make no mistake about it, its going to happen), I’d buy one, in fact I would camp out overnight to make sure that I got one.

And just to clarify, I do not and will not paint all Muslims with the same brush. I will however condemn those Muslims (and there are a lot of them on this planet) who think I should eat, drink and live the same shit as they do and who are prepared to use violence to get me to see things their way.

Make no mistake about, I have had a gut full when it comes to Muslims, and my patience is wearing thing. I’m sick of the Muslim bullshit, as is most of the rest of the rational thinking world, and if it were left up to me I’d be doing more to shut them down then what is currently being done.

I make no apologies for the way I feel about the problems Muslims have brought into western civilization. None.

Lastly, people can paint Major Nadil Malik Hasan anyway they like, but at the end of the day, he terrorized soldiers and THAT MAKES HIM AS MUCH OF A TERRORIST AS HE IS AN AMERICAN.

Sphere: Related Content


Tags: Homicidal Maniacs

7 responses so far ↓

  • 1 mario // Nov 8, 2009 at 5:27 PM

    This guy and every other moslem in the military are terrorists as far as I am concerned. I am a retired Tech. Sargent in the US Air Force, my whole career I saw pwole like this asshole, they smile at you and shoot you when you aren’t looking at them, they are cowards and think nothing of anyone else but their radical beliefs and the military knoiws that thses people can’t be trusted, yet here we have a good example of NOT keeping our soldiers safe from these monsters. They cry (moslems) wolf if they are “profiled” and we are so stupid to look the other way, then they just shoot you and they don’t care, time to deport all moslems from this country and any other that wants to get rid of this scourge of the earth.

  • 2 CG // Nov 8, 2009 at 6:31 PM

    Hey Mario,

    I am not pro-Muslim, not by a long shot, but there are some good Muslim people. There damn well better be with almost 2 billion of them sharing this planet with us.

    I know some good ones, because I have met a few, but no I can’t say that I would trust them with my life, or that they would have my back if I was to get ‘into it’ so to speak, with another Muslim. I certainly wouldn’t want them watching my back in the war on terrorism, that’s for damn f***king sure.

    Having said that, I don’t think Muslims, at least while the war on terrorism continues, should be allowed entry into countries who have forces serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. The risks to civilian populations of those nations is way to high. A moratorium on Muslim immigration, you bet your bet your ass mate. If that makes me a xenophobe so be it. Better to be a xenophobe then another bombing or shooting victim of Muslim extremism, right.

    I think it is stupid that both the Canadian and American military allow Muslims to enlist. Like I said in another blog, it is a stupid idea.

  • 3 Hasid Al-Abdi // Nov 9, 2009 at 3:52 AM

    You f***ing nazi. Islam is the religion of peace. We will carry this peace to every corner of Allah’s earth. F*** you and your lies against Islam. You do nothing but spread hate for a peace-loving people. We will succeed, and you will fade away to Gehenna.

  • 4 CG // Nov 9, 2009 at 7:02 AM

    First of Hasid, what are you doing using my yahoo.ca email addy to comment in here? That was just dumb buddy, in fact it was really, really, dumb.

    Secondly, saying that Islam is a religion of peace in the manner in which you make that point. aah yeah right buddy…You sound like you’re really into that peace thing.

    And lastly, what are you going to do about my spreading hate for a peace-loving people, blow me the f*** up?

    You’re an idiot mate. Lies against Islam LMFWHITEAO…So like Islamists aren’t deliberating going out of their way to kill innocent people with acts of terrorism, is that what you are saying?

    Thanks for stopping by Hasid, and the next time you want to leave a comment, have the balls to use your own email, otherwise your comment will be depleted as fast as it was automatically approved.

    You are my friend, A TOTAL F***ING MORON.

    Hasid, the winters are pretty cold in Manitoba, aren’t they?

    Don’t f*** with me mate.

  • 5 flipper // Nov 10, 2009 at 2:22 PM

    Boy I just love it when people tell the truth!Mr Al-Abdi sure ripped you a new one.He will prove that Islam is the religion of peace (even if he has to torture and kill you to make his point..)He speaks of world domination by Islam..That is NOT going to happen.The Western world has got to see these hypocrites for what they are! A bunch of TWO -faced bastards that will preach the peaceful Islam but then launch terror attacks against innocent women & children. The kind of Imam that will preach that all infidels must die!
    The Fort Hood terror attack is being manipulated by the media to look like it is an isolated event perpertrated by a lone lunatic…The media shy away from linking this attack with the Muslim religion and wouldn’t you know it…Every Muslim interviewed had NO idea that this lunatic had any extreme views and they are SHOCKED that this massacre happened! YEAH RIGHT!!!the terrorist groups will praise the work of this Islamist terrorist and will convince other people to follow Hasan’s shining example…The only good thing is that the American Military will try COL. HASAN and even the mighty ACLU is going to have a hard time getting Hasan out from in front of a firing squad! FUCK HIM! ANOTHER ISLAMIC TERRORIST BITES THE DUST!

  • 6 CG // Nov 10, 2009 at 5:04 PM

    Hey flipper, you have to read this blog entry.

    Abdi, if that is his real Muslim name, is a moron. Religion of peace, lmfwhiteao. The link above by the way, its about a Muslim conveying a message of peace here in Australia, and the way Sheik Haron is conveying that message, well lets just say the guy has more balls than brains, and perhaps even a death wish.

    As for the Fort Hood thing, the FBI has stated that it wasn’t a terrorist attack, but only because there wasn’t more than one terrorist involved in the attack. That’s what I think anyway, that and the fact that the army and the U.S. government will go out of their way to avoid labeling this a terrorist attack to look out for the best interests of Muslims, which by the way is totally beyond me as to why they would do that. Like does anybody think a Muslim would go out of his or her way to protect our best interests? By “our” I am referring to us, the “Infidels of the West.”

    This is a terrorist attack and while nobody wants to call it that, perhaps when the death penalty is on the table for Major Hasan, he’ll want to go down as a martyr and admit that it was a terrorist attack, but that it was one that he planned and implemented on his own after seeking permission from a cleric to carry it out. I hear that Hasan hooked up with an whack job cleric in New York not all that long ago. Ya think he might have been asking permission to carry the Fort Hood attack out, because I certainly think so.

  • 7 uplink // Nov 18, 2009 at 4:46 AM

    Good read here by lorne Gunter/National Post:
    http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/columnists/story.html?id=f6084276-5650-4162-be3d-1c320ab707c7

    “The most disturbing aspect of last week’s Fort Hood shootings — aside from the horrendous loss of life, of course — has been the triumph of political correctness in the analysis of Maj. Nadil Hasan’s motives. Many “experts” have assiduously avoided the obvious cause: Hasan’s fundamentalist, radicalized Muslim views.

    A man runs into a room of unarmed people and starts firing away while shouting ” Allahu Akbar” ( “Allah is Great”). He has had frequent arguments — many of them extremely heated — with several fellow officers in recent years over the alleged stupidity and immorality of the West’s wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. He expressed public agreement with the Koran’s exhortations to kill infidels, justified suicide bombings, attended a radical Virginia mosque, sought permission from superiors to have Muslim-American soldiers exempted from service in Middle Eastern wars and, among other things, attempted to make contact with al-Qaeda recruiters.

    Yet many analysts and commentators have ignored this evidence and put forward, instead, shallow war-psyche diagnoses they seem to have copied from M*A*S*H episodes. Most centre around the theory that Hasan snapped under the pressure of his forthcoming deployment to Afghanistan.

    But even if Hasan was driven to mass murder because he could not bear the idea of serving in a war zone, the cause of his breakdown was his Muslim-ness, not battle stress. The implication of those making these excuses on Hasan’s behalf has been that the thought of facing deadly fire in combat was too much for the major.

    But, of course, that is not it at all. He couldn’t face the notion of having to serve in an army he saw as persecuting his fellow Muslims, so he struck back at that army before it could ship him out to a place he believed it should not be. His belief in the teachings of Muhammad trumped his sworn duty in the U.S. Army.

    Still, the first instinct of White House and U.S. Army spokesmen, as well as most CNN, CBC, BBC, MSNBC and other analysts, has been to deny any connection between Hasan’s murderous deeds and his faith.

    Imagine if a fundamentalist Christian soldier had shot up a room full of unarmed Muslims while shouting “Jesus Christ is Lord and Saviour.” Imagine he had a fascination with Old Testament stories of how God smote his followers’ enemies. His pastor had advocated a new crusade to rid the Holy Land of non-Christians. He had hung out at a survivalist camp for a cultish group of white supremacists who claim a Heaven-sent mission.

    These self-same commentators who are struggling so mightily now to overlook the religious aspects of Hasan’s crime would be first in line to insist that Evangelical Christianity was inherently violent and demand something be done to rein in this hateful theology.”

    “It is one thing to be tolerant of others’ views and beliefs, so long as those others are respectful of your creed and ideology in return. That has long been a hallmark of our pluralistic democracies. It is still. No matter how bad human rights commissions, Toronto Star columnists or special interest cause pleaders may claim discrimination is in Western societies, tolerance is and always has been at its greatest in the West.

    The trouble with political correctness is that it doesn’t require that others be respectful in return.

    When others with different beliefs attack us, political correctness goes further. It takes tolerance to a culturally suicidal degree by denying that others hate us despite our respect for them.”

comments








Crooked in Canada use third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit this website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you.




Disclaimer:Opinions, views and theories published in Crooked in Canada are just that, views, opinions and theories.


All views, opinions and theories are formed after gleaning information from news stories that appear on the worldwide web, which as we all are not always factual either.


All opinions, views, and theories are qualified with the following or like statements: "I could be wrong", "It isn't a stretch to think that...", "I think", "I believe" or "it is my opinion". Although the aforementioned statements are not always included in the blog post; it is certainly implied in each and every post published in Crooked in Canada.If you take this blog too seriously, YOU NEED HELP!

Contact: editor@crookedincanada.com